This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
phase2:material [2015/01/26 13:04] – hinzmann | phase2:material [2015/01/27 11:36] (current) – decosa | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
tkgeometry/ | tkgeometry/ | ||
- | // Modules: masses taken from TOB modules / 2 | ||
M Si 0 0 0 0.3 mm L ; | M Si 0 0 0 0.3 mm L ; | ||
Line 31: | Line 30: | ||
Ideal 0.53651 | Ideal 0.53651 | ||
Loss 7.5 | Loss 7.5 | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | We changed the mass of the modules components (mass of module components ) by doubling it, and we repeated the exercise by leaving the mass of the components as it was and increasing the thickness (sensor thickness) of the sensor in order to get the same increase in mass. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Real | ||
+ | 1 GeV | ||
+ | | ||
+ | Sensor thickness | ||
+ | |||
+ | C I C I | ||
+ | pT 2.4663 | ||
+ | d 0.00651 0.00850 0.00776 0.01019 | ||
+ | z0 0.00747 0.01399 | ||
+ | | ||
+ | Ideal | ||
+ | 1 GeV | ||
+ | C I C I | ||
+ | pT 0.55644 0.086291 | ||
+ | d 0.00255 0.00268 0.00255 0.00268 | ||
+ | z0 0.00277 0.00288 | ||
+ | | ||
+ | It is more convenient to use a thicker sensor with respect to using heavier material. |