This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
phase2:different_scenarios [2015/01/27 16:57] – cgalloni | phase2:different_scenarios [2015/01/27 17:23] (current) – dsalerno | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
- | Different | + | Different |
- | We bin our measurement in 4 pt region: 1 Gev,2 GeV, 5GeV ,20 GeV. | + | We bin our measurement in 4 pt regions: 1 Gev, 2 GeV, 5GeV, 20 GeV. |
- | And we consider 3 eta region: C ( eta< 0.8), I (eta< 1.6), F (eta< | + | And we consider 3 eta regions: C ( eta< 0.8), I (eta< 1.6), F (eta< |
We use different scenarios: | We use different scenarios: | ||
- | TP- Technical Proposal: 4 Layers for the BP with pixel with the same resolution as the Run I in Phase I (13 um x 28 um); sensor: 100 um x 150 um, thickness T=0.3 mm ; innermost layer at 3 cm from the beampipe and the outermost layer 16.1 cm. | + | * TP- Technical Proposal: 4 Layers for the BP with pixel with the same resolution as the Run I in Phase I (13 um x 28 um); sensor: 100 um x 150 um, thickness T=0.3 mm ; innermost layer at 3 cm from the beampipe and the outermost layer 16.1 cm. |
- | TP with outer layer at 18.8 cm. | + | * TP with outer layer at 18.8 cm. |
+ | |||
+ | * TP but one layer (the 3rd one at radius=10.9 cm) removed. | ||
+ | |||
+ | * TP with better resolution (7um x 15 um) sensors in first layer. | ||
+ | |||
+ | * TP with better resolution (7um x 15 um) sensors in first layer (sensor thickness = 0.225 in the first Layer). [ If the pixel size is decreased 75 um x 100 um, to have the same charge sharing between pixel that we have in the Run I, the thickness should be reduced] | ||
+ | |||
+ | * TP with better resolution (7um x 15 um) sensors in first layer, increasing material of the first layer [ the better resolution pixel has an area that is half compared to the Run I pixel. So in the same detector there will be a double number of pixels and an increase of the material, especially for the read-out]. | ||
+ | |||
+ | * TP with better resolution (7um x 15 um) sensors in all 4 layers, (pixel thickness =0.225 in all Layers). | ||
+ | |||
+ | * TP with better resolution (7um x 15 um) sensors in all 4 layers, increasing material in all layers. | ||
- | TP but one layer (the 3rd one at radius=10.9 cm) removed. | + | |
+ | * Strawman5 configuration is explained in [[https:// | ||
- | TP with better resolution (7um x 15 um) sensors in first layer. | + | * Strawman5, |
- | TP with better resolution (7um x 15 um) sensors in first layer (sensor | + | * Strawman5, |
+ | |||
+ | * TP with the number of pixels quadrupled. [Just to test] | ||
- | TP with better resolution (7um x 15 um) sensors | + | The results are reported |
- | + | ||
- | TP with better resolution (7um x 15 um) sensors in all 4 layers, (pixel thickness =0.225 in all Layers). | + | |
- | + | ||
- | TP with better resolution (7um x 15 um) sensors in all 4 layers, increasing material in all layers. | + | |
- | + | ||
- | Strawman5 configuration is expalind in | + | |
- | [[https://test-lantonel-tklayout.web.cern.ch/test-lantonel-tklayout/Strawman_5/indexpixel.html]] | + | |
- | (with material changes in the tracker, and the reference | + | |
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | Strawman5, with better resolution (7um x 15 um) sensors in 2 innermost ( and extension ) layers, Phase I resolution (13 um x 28 um) sensors in 2 layers. | + | |
- | Strawman5, with better resolution (7um x 15 um) sensors in 2 innermost ( and extension ) layers, Phase I resolution (13 um x 28 um) sensors in 2 layers, (pixel thickness =0.225 in 2 layers). | + | |
- | + | ||
- | TP with the number of pixels quadrupled. [Just to test] | + | |